Help
Best Processor Developer Which Processor Developer rules?
#1 Guest_Speed-Addict_*
Posted 30 January 2005 - 09:33 PM
So who is better? i predict that it will be 50% AMD 50% Intel
#2 Guest_VaskoSoftware_*
Posted 30 January 2005 - 10:31 PM
You made some mistakes in ur poll. Its Athlon, not Athelon (or mabe Athelon is something new???) also u did not include quite a few other proccessors.
#4 Guest_Mischcabob_*
Posted 31 January 2005 - 05:06 AM
QUOTE
You made some mistakes in ur poll. Its Athlon, not Athelon (or mabe Athelon is something new???)
Give him a break. We know he meant Athlon.
Yes, he could have added Cyrix, PowerPC (IBM), Via, Motorola, HP, Siemens AND MANY MORE. Best just focus on desktop computer chips though.
I would add IBM PowerPC (Apple) as excellent candidate though.
Anyway, my bet is on AMD Athlon particularly their branded Athlon 64/FX/Opteron class of CPUs.
#5 Guest_chp_*
Posted 31 January 2005 - 05:48 AM
Yeah these are the most popular....and i voted for Intel.
And Athelon is Athlon
i want an Athelon
And Athelon is Athlon
i want an Athelon
#6 Guest_Speed-Addict_*
Posted 31 January 2005 - 08:17 AM
Spelling error give me a break, as for all the other processors , if i was to list every single one for every single utility I would fall asleep, i listed the most popular ones for desktop pcs. as for IBM its not there because its crap but ok ill add it
but ok ill add it
#7 Guest_euromix_*
Posted 31 January 2005 - 11:35 PM
Athlon for desktop systems and (dual) Xeon for servers 
#8 Guest_Mischcabob_*
Posted 01 February 2005 - 01:32 AM
QUOTE (Speed-Addict @ Jan 31 2005, 01:17 AM)
i listed the most popular ones for desktop pcs, as for IBM its not there because its crap but ok ill add it
but ok ill add itCrap???
Obviously not familiar with Apple PowerPC G5 computers that are powered by IBM’s 64-bit POWER series processors. Dual 2.5GHz PowerPC G5 systems are quite a marvel with 1.25Ghz FSB and staggering 20GBps of throughput. Only thing that comes close to it in performance is Athlon 64 FX/Opteron class of chips.
#10 Guest_Mischcabob_*
Posted 02 February 2005 - 07:38 PM
QUOTE (Speed-Addict @ Feb 2 2005, 12:23 PM)
Nice rebuttal. What are you ten years old or something?
Sorry, couldn't resist
#11 Guest_lazyboy_*
Posted 02 February 2005 - 08:00 PM
My knowledge on hardware isnt that good 
but ive had Athlons in all of my machines and the seem to do the job nicely 
, thats all i care bout
but ive had Athlons in all of my machines and the seem to do the job nicely , thats all i care bout
#14 Guest_VaskoSoftware_*
Posted 15 February 2005 - 02:53 AM
Sorry. There were just quite a few u missed, that i PERSONALLY found quite important.
About the spelling error:
U must agree, it is important to accept your mistakes, but oh well. Im sorry i pointed out your mistake? i guess?
I think you just listed the ones you knew, not the ones you wanted to list. If you knew better, you would have listed some of the handheld CPUs, or even... nevermind...
When i was helping my friends set up their server, we purchased AMD Opteron.
Intel Celeron sux, since it burned down on me, like the 4th day the machine was on, Pentium seems to do the job.
Not long ago, i was still powered by VIA Cyrix... 3 i think it was. But i gave that PC to a friend of mine. I never actually saw Itanium in use, is it equivalent to pentium 4, or is it weaker?
Tim
About the spelling error:
U must agree, it is important to accept your mistakes, but oh well. Im sorry i pointed out your mistake? i guess?
I think you just listed the ones you knew, not the ones you wanted to list. If you knew better, you would have listed some of the handheld CPUs, or even... nevermind...
When i was helping my friends set up their server, we purchased AMD Opteron.
Intel Celeron sux, since it burned down on me, like the 4th day the machine was on, Pentium seems to do the job.
Not long ago, i was still powered by VIA Cyrix... 3 i think it was. But i gave that PC to a friend of mine. I never actually saw Itanium in use, is it equivalent to pentium 4, or is it weaker?
Tim
#15 Guest_Mischcabob_*
Posted 15 February 2005 - 03:16 AM
Definately missed a few processors ... but this is not real techie forum anyway 
Intel Celeron, AMD duron definately would count as value low-end processors. I had a AMD duron 600 for a few years... ran a tad hot, but still beat comparable Celeron anyday.
Itanium 2 is Intel's overpriced server platform... Wouldn't compare to P4 since there built for multi/dual processor server applications for running databases, technical computing, supply chain management, etc.
Personally, I like the AMD Opteron 2 or 4-way processor with its backward 32-64bit compatibility and higher throughput.
Intel Celeron, AMD duron definately would count as value low-end processors. I had a AMD duron 600 for a few years... ran a tad hot, but still beat comparable Celeron anyday.
Itanium 2 is Intel's overpriced server platform... Wouldn't compare to P4 since there built for multi/dual processor server applications for running databases, technical computing, supply chain management, etc.
Personally, I like the AMD Opteron 2 or 4-way processor with its backward 32-64bit compatibility and higher throughput.
